The media are all into how men today are lost and being crushed by women but what is really happening is we’re re-creating ourselves and, more and more, letting women take care of business. We’re trying not to act like fools anymore and part of that is not showing interest and indeed not being interested. Or not for the obvious reasons. Big tits and blonde hair for example, although those attributes will always have followers, are no longer the agenda-setters that they used to be. Strong women are suddenly the ones who beta males like me—we are the majority, after all—are looking for. Women have other assets to bring to the table than what they sit on at the table.
That’s Megyn Flynn. It’s her intellect and personality that most attracts. You wouldn’t kick her out of bed for eating crackers but you wouldn’t turn off her podcast, either, for not sharing your views. Speaking as a liberal—even radical—black male.
The reason to raise the issue of Megyn’s attractiveness is that she’s gotten a lot hotter since the U.S.-Israeli attack on Iran. After noting her closeness to the Trump administration she has nonetheless not been reluctant to call bullshit and question the administration’s motives and/or logic. And to question our relationship to Israel which, increasingly, appears to be unhealthy—for us. She has repeated various times, as well, early and often, that American women are opposed to the war. Even if guys, as usual, despite our new touchy-feeliness, like to see those planes taking off from the carriers, headed for Tehran.
And although Megyn didn’t say this specifically, the U.S. now finds itself in the peculiar position of having killed a lot more innocent Iranian civilians, who are supposed to be among our major concerns with the Khamenei regime, than the ayatollahs ever did.
You may say, well, how is that different from the liberal media who have also opposed the Iran War? There are a couple of major distinctions.
First, the liberal media condemns everything that Donald Trump does. If the President says, “Today is Tuesday,” the New York Times will quickly publish documentary evidence that the day of the week is actually Thursday. By complaining about everything that Donald Trump stands for, the Times has lost a lot of credibility. This is especially true because the newspaper of record, as well as American media in general, has pushed the Israeli narrative, falsely, for decades. Benjamin Netanyahu is not a victim. He’s a predator who, by the way, has never even been completely profiled by the Times. The newspaper of record has also been pushing an anti-Iran narrative for years, showing particular glee about U.S.-Israeli infrastructure, intelligence and worm attacks. Because Israel has been American media’s darling, long after reporters knew better.
Is this an appropriate time to mention that the NYT is a Jewish-owned/managed publication, and executive editor Joe Kahn’s family has business interests in Israel? Or, by making these remarks, does one become guilty, once gain, of antisemitism? Please.
Megyn Kelly also differs from “the mainstream media” because she can walk and chew gum at the same time, to quote LBJ. MSNBC el al, all the usual liberal suspects, are incapable of making exceptions, as is the case with the Times. They follow the playbook and condemn anything that is not on the Democratic Party agenda. So, too, on the subject of Iran/Israel. The major enabler of the Israelis historically have been Democrats, whether the subject has been arms, financial aid, or sharing of intelligence. The Republicans are latecomers to the love affair with Israel, but as with the Iraq War, which a lot of Dems also favored, the party’s policy platform is now whatever Tel Aviv wants, Tel Aviv gets.
Megyn is kind of cool though, even if she is a Republican. (She self-identifies as an independent.) She is a wonderful combination of brains, experience and, well, cattiness. She’s not afraid to go after other women, which is super-enjoyable if you’re a guy. She even goes after black women which is practically unheard of among white female talking heads. She recently dissed Michelle Obama, who is one of my favorite people in the whole world. But, for one thing, Michelle may have deserved it and, two, frankly, the former first lady has successfully fended off more shit than any ten white women combined.
As a Texan, in the recent Democratic Senate primary, my money was on Jasmine Crockett. But Megyn pointed out after the election that Crockett has a lot of queenie-type behaviors, kind of like a black princess. As a New Black Male, who no longer allows that little weenie—actually it’s quite large by white standards—to run my life? Black people who struggle for and achieve success and then start acting like the white people we have opposed for centuries get on my last nerve. For that reason, when Megyn also goes after the other Meghan, Duchess of Sussex, my ears perk up and there’s a smile on my face.
What’s scary about Megan Kelly? Speaking in the vein that she’s good but not perfect?
She never has black or Latino or Asian guests on her podcast. At least in my experience as a viewer. One hesitates to call her racist but she doesn’t seem to praise anyone who isn’t white, either. That’s a bad sign. She strikes me, frankly—speaking as a black guy who knows the competition—she strikes me as a white chick who doesn’t have any friends or associates outside her own race.
If true, that itself is the saddest commentary of all.
No comments:
Post a Comment